No help from ICANN

This is a post from 04/18/07 by Bjorn Kassoe Andersen, founder, owner and leader of Direction, a management and communications consulting company based in Denmark, which had its domain,direction.com, stolen back in 2006.

 

ICANN has no rules for enforcing the return of stolen domain names. Such rules simply do not exist. If your domain name is stolen, it seems that your only chance of getting it back is arbitration under ICANN’s rules for domain name disputes or a court case.

This is a systemic problem. It is the result of a fast growing Internet and a complex domain name system which is only loosely knitted together. There are few rules and most transactions take place in an international arena in which national legislation and practices are hard to apply.

Here is a list of the organisations whose behavior and policies in our specific case constituted a faulty system which made it easy to steal our domain name and hard for us to get it back:

www.000domains.com – the (former) registrar of our domain name direction.com. Like most registrars of international domain names, they permit change of registration details and transfers by email and do not provide an option for domain name owners to require paperwork before any changes take place. 000domains’ procedure for cancelling an offending change of registry details and transfer did not work. They allowed transfer of our domain to another registrar, even though we informed them that we had not requested any changes and provided all the information and documentation they requested. Once the transfer had taken place, 000domains refused to initiate a return of our domain, stating that ICANN rules do not allow them so to do.

www.struerhosting.dk – our (former) Danish ISP, at that time known as struer.net. A pop3 email account hosted on their servers was hacked and the perpetrator set up a forward of all ingoing mail. This was all it took to initiate a domain name transfer in our name. Struer.net’s management said in a letter that their systems are safe. But Struer.net’s tech support informed us shortly after the theft that they did not have any log details that could be used to track the perpetrator. An ISP with no log files does not provide a satisfactory level of security.

www.123cheapdomains.com aka tucows.com. This was the new registrar used by the perpetrator. Tucows at first refused to return direction.com, as their position was that everything about the transfer appeared to be legal. Tucows did, however, return the domain to us once they were instructed to do so following arbitration from WIPO.

www.smartname.com – Services like this one monetize domain names with a natural flow of traffic through direct typing of the URL. When someone guesses that a domain like direction.com might provide a service with, say, driving directions, they go to the URL and find no driving directions but lots of ads for route planners and GPS systems. Smartname is explicit in their terms and conditions that they do not provide services to fraudsters. In our case they did provide service to a fraudster, and they have not responded to our correspondence.

www.icann.org – this is the organisation responsible for the domain name policies that leave you lost if someone steals your domain name – unless, that is, you also have your domain registered as a trademark and can pursue the offender through ICANN’s policies for domain name disputes. This is only possible if you have a registered trade mark similar to the stolen domain and are willing to pay a fee of USD 1500 to an arbitrator such as WIPO. You will also have to hire the necessary legal assistance – or spend time getting to learn how the system works and do the work yourself.

Go to the front page to write a comment

© 2011 Traverse Legal, PLC. All Rights Reserved.
Traverse Legal on LinkedInTraverse Legal on FacebookTraverse Legal on Twitter
Events & Conferences:
  • International Trademark Association 2011, San Francisco, California
  • Cyber Law Summit 2011, Las Vegas, Nevada
  • Game Developers Conference 2011, San Francisco, California
  • DOMAINfest 2011, Santa Monica, California
Recent Attorney Speaking Engagements:
  • South By Southwest 2010 SXSW Interactive Conference, Austin, Texas
  • West LegalEdcenter Midwestern Law Firm Management, Chicago, Illinois
  • Internet Advertising under Part 255, Altitude Design Summit, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Online Defamation and Reputation Management, News Talk 650 AM, The Cory Kolt Show, Canada Public Radio Saskatewan Canada
  • Alternative Fee Structures, Center for Competitive Management, Jersey City, New Jersey
  • FTC Part 255 Advertising Requirements, Mom 2.0 Conference, Houston, Texas
  • Webmaster Radio, Cybersquatting & Domain Monetization, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Notable Complex Litigation Cases Handled By Our Lawyers:
  • Trademark Infringement, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Cybersquatting Law, Trademark Law and Dilution Detroit, Michigan
  • Internet Defamation & Online Libel Indianapolis, Indiana
  • Trade Secret Theft, Chicago, Illinois
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Miami, Florida
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Eastern Dist. of Virginia, Alexandria
  • Stolen Domain Name, Orlando, Florida
  • Commercial Litigation, Tampa, Florida
  • Copyright Infringement and Cybersquatting Law, Grand Rapids, Michigan
  • Mass Tort Litigation, Los Angeles, California
  • Stolen Domain Name, Detroit, Michigan
  • Adwords Keyword Trademark Infringement, Los Angeles, California
  • Trademark Infringement & Unfair Competition, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Non-Compete Agreement and Trade Secret Theft, Detroit, Michigan
  • Mass Tort, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Mass Tort, Tyler, Texas
  • Insurance Indemnity, New York
  • Copyright Infringement, Detroit, Michigan